Argumentative Essay Topics For Richard III

Argumentative Essay Topics For Richard IIIIs there really a place to be found for argumentative essays in Richard III? As a professor of English literature, I tend to teach the style. It is one of the most important elements of writing.The essay is a superb way to work with powerful rhetorical devices that lead to a full appreciation of the material in the text. The style of argumentative essay is so closely tied to the skills of sentence construction that some writers have trouble developing this skill without engaging in argumentative exercises. These have to be integrated into the writing process in order to make them effective.One of the great strengths of good argumentative essay topics for Richard III is that the characters in the play have been fashioned to fit thematically into the context. They have been trained to deliver a speech, and to be effective speeches they need to work from certain pre-established assumptions. This is why a speech by Henry Crawford is so different from a speech by King Lear. They are the two sides of the same coin.Another reason to make good argumentative essay topics for Richard III is that the play engages in two-act structure. In this type of structure the point of view shifts between three characters in each act. In the case of Richard III, the perspective changes from Henry II to Richard, Henry's brother, and back again. When the perspective shifts it requires the use of a different form of rhetorical device.In the second act, in particular, the technique is very effective. Once Henry II and Richard II meet face to face, it is vital that the character deliver his speech from the same position and to the same goal. Each has been taught to know what the objective of the speech is, but each knows he needs to find that answer, because the other man can see it in every line of his argument.Good argumentative essay topics for Richard III also follow the same pattern as that of the first act. There is a sense in which the write r and the audience are the same; in fact, the writer is positioned as the audience. What helps the first act deliver its point is the fact that it follows the same principle as the second.Then, there are the different questions of the story. On the one hand, Henry is not in the King's Council, where the king meets with advisers. So the first question he needs to answer is: why does he believe he has a right to the throne? That leads to the second and more difficult question: why does he think he is capable of exercising the right to the throne?Even though I have used an argumentative structure in my argumentative essay topics for Richard III, I have tried to avoid the obvious parallel with Shakespeare's history plays. For example, I do not teach the final speech from King Lear. It is better that one does not read King Lear as a study in the art of political speechmaking.